0 Comments

 

Include the following as part of your outline: 

  • The reason or purpose of the presentation (e.g., a problem, challenge, or learning opportunity that needs to be addressed), along with the setting and audience.
  • Explain how 2-3 brain-based learning principles will be incorporated, and why they are appropriate for the intended audience (e.g., multi-sensory learning, spaced repetition, memory consolidation, real-world relevance). 
  • A minimum of two strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience, such as human attention, memory, and motivation. Justify how the strategies are appropriate for your setting and audience.  
  • The anticipated changes or desired outcomes of your presentation. 
  • At least one potential challenge of learning that may be encountered within the chosen professional setting, including suggested methods to overcome the challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.  
  • At least two additional resources that support the intended learning, or that can be shared with the audience for future reference. Your resources are going to be things that they can look at to gain more info. This can be video links, blogs, books, etc.  They may or may not be a part of your references. 

Support your work with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Brain-Based Learning in Action – Rubric

Purpose, Setting, Audience 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Thoroughly describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the

presentation.

4. Acceptable 11.31 points

Aptly describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the presentation.

3. Approaching 9.62 points

Adequately describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the

presentation.

2. Insufficient 8.97 points

Inadequately describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the

presentation.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the presentation is

incomplete or not included.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Brain-Based Learning 19.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 19.5 points

Proficiently explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated

and why they are appropriate for the audience.

4. Acceptable 16.97 points

Effectively explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated

and why they are appropriate for the audience.

3. Approaching 14.43 points

Partially explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated

and why they are appropriate for the audience.

2. Insufficient 13.45 points

Insufficiently explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be

incorporated and why they are appropriate for the audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Fails to identify 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated and

why they are appropriate for the audience.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategy 19.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 19.5 points

Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience

are ideal and expertly justified for the setting and audience.

4. Acceptable 16.97 points

Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience

are logical and soundly justified for the setting and audience.

3. Approaching 14.43 points

Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience

are lacking detail and/or minimally justified for the setting and audience.

2. Insufficient 13.45 points

Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience

are ambiguous and/or inadequately justified for the setting and audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Strategies for learning are not designed based on concepts related to neuroscience

and/or there is no justification.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Anticipated Changes or Desired Outcomes 19.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 19.5 points

Includes insightful anticipated changes or desired outcomes.

4. Acceptable 16.97 points

Includes relevant anticipated changes or desired outcomes.

3. Approaching 14.43 points

Includes overly simplistic anticipated changes or desired outcomes.

2. Insufficient 13.45 points

Includes unrealistic or unclear anticipated changes or desired outcomes.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Anticipated changes or desired outcomes are not addressed or are irrelevant.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Challenge and Solution 19.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 19.5 points

Expertly identifies at least one potential challenge of learning that could arise in the

chosen professional setting with ideal suggestions for how to overcome that

challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.

4. Acceptable 16.97 points

Clearly identifies at least one potential challenge of learning that could arise in the

chosen professional setting with competent suggestions for how to overcome that

challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.

3. Approaching 14.43 points

Marginally identifies at least one potential challenge of learning that could arise in

the chosen professional setting with broad suggestions for how to overcome that

challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.

2. Insufficient 13.45 points

Poorly identifies at least one potential challenge of learning that could arise in the

chosen professional setting with inadequate suggestions for how to overcome that

challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Fails to identify at least one potential challenge of learning that could arise in the

chosen professional setting or does not include suggestions for how to overcome

that challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Resources 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Additional resources that could be added to support brain-based learning or shared

as a future reference are realistic and thoughtful.

4. Acceptable 11.31 points

Additional resources that could be added to support brain-based learning or shared

as a future reference are appropriate.

3. Approaching 9.62 points

Additional resources that could be added to support brain-based learning or shared

as future reference are general.

2. Insufficient 8.97 points

Additional resources that could be added to support brain-based learning or shared

as a future reference are unsuitable.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Additional resources that could be added to support brain-based learning or shared

as a future reference are irrelevant or not included.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Organization 13 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 13 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 11.31 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 9.62 points

An attempt is made to organize the content and provide the audience with a sense

of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 8.97 points

The content is not well organized, the sequence is indiscernible, and the main idea

is ambiguous.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content is disorganized with no logical sequencing. The ideas presented are

compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations

and references.

5. Target 6.5 points

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and

correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of

error.

4. Acceptable 5.66 points

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching 4.81 points

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are

documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor

formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient 4.48 points

Supporting research is limited or insufficient. Appropriate format is attempted, but

some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are

evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Supporting research is not included or is irrelevant to the topic. Appropriate format

is not used.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.66 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.81 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.48 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Total 130 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Order Solution Now

Categories: