|
Final Project 1
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnwrapping the Standard
|
|
45 pts
Advanced
*Unwrapping the standards document shows understanding of concepts and is fully aligned to the CCRS.
|
38.25 pts
Proficient
*Unwrapping the standards document shows understanding of concepts and is closely aligned to the CCRS.
|
31.5 pts
Basic
*Unwrapping the standards document shows some understanding of concepts and is somewhat aligned to the CCRS.
|
24.75 pts
Minimal
*Unwrapping the standards document does not show understanding of concepts nor is it aligned to the CCRS.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
45 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #9 – Reflection and Continuous Growth
The teacher is a reflective practitioner who uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (students, families, and other professionals in the learning community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrerequisite Assessment
|
|
70 pts
Advanced
*Assessment is based on the prerequisites stated in the unwrapping the standards document, valid, fully formatted for students, includes detailed scoring criteria, and includes an explanation of how results will be used.
|
59.5 pts
Proficient
*Assessment is closely based on the prerequisites stated in the unwrapping the standards document, mostly valid, formatted for students, includes scoring criteria, and includes an explanation of how results will be used.
|
49 pts
Basic
*Assessment is based on the prerequisites stated in the unwrapping the standards document, somewhat valid, partly formatted for students, may include a scoring criterion, OR includes a brief explanation of how results will be used.
|
38.5 pts
Minimal
*Assessment is not based on the prerequisites stated in the unwrapping the standards document.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
70 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #6A – Assessment
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to document learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s ongoing planning and instruction.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummative Test Blueprint
|
|
45 pts
Advanced
*Test blueprint addresses all concepts and competencies in the unpacking the standards document and is balanced to relative importance of competencies with accurate DOK designations.
|
38.25 pts
Proficient
*Test blueprint follows the concepts and competencies in the unpacking the standards document and is balanced to relative importance of competencies with mostly accurate DOK levels (minimal errors).
|
31.5 pts
Basic
*Test blueprint somewhat follows the concepts and competencies in the unpacking the standards document and is not balanced to relative importance of competencies OR DOK levels incorrectly designated.
|
24.75 pts
Minimal
*Test blueprint does not follow the concepts and competencies in the unpacking the standards document and is not balanced to relative importance of competencies OR missing DOK levels.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
45 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummative Assessment
|
|
70 pts
Advanced
*Summative assessment: fully based on learning targets identified in the blueprint, original (copied text cited), valid, scoring criteria, AND grading policies outlined including an explanation of how scoring results will be used to guide future instruction for all students. Minimum of 25 questions of varying DOK levels
|
59.5 pts
Proficient
*Summative assessment: closely based on learning targets identified in the blueprint, original (copied text cited), valid, scoring criteria, grading policies outlined including an explanation of how scoring results will be used to guide future instruction in general. Minimum of 25 questions of varying DOK levels.
|
49 pts
Basic
*Summative assessment: somewhat based on learning targets identified in the blueprint, some questions were not original, not valid, inadequate scoring criteria and grading policies outlined. No explanation of how scoring results will be used to guide future instruction. Fewer than 25 questions.
|
38.5 pts
Minimal
Summative assessment: not based on learning targets.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
70 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #6B – Assessment
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to document learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s ongoing planning and instruction.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerformance Assessment
|
|
70 pts
Advanced
*Assessment is at a DOK 3 level or higher, includes both components of teacher planning and GRASPS document, student instruction page is visually appealing and includes instructions needed for students to succeed on the assessment, and rubric includes all outlined details (assesses learning targets, is complex, weighted, and how it will be scored.)
|
59.5 pts
Proficient
*Assessment is visually appealing, includes both components of teacher planning and GRASPS document, student instruction page includes instructions needed for students to succeed on the assessment, and rubric includes all outlined details (assesses learning targets, is complex, weighted, and how it will be scored.)
|
49 pts
Basic
*Assessment is somewhat visually appealing, includes some components of the teacher planning or GRASPS document, student instruction page is visually appealing but instructions are limited, and rubric includes all outlined details (assesses learning targets, is complex, weighted, and how it will be scored.)
|
38.5 pts
Minimal
*Assessment is not visually appealing, is missing components of teacher planning or GRASPS document, provides little opportunity for students to transfer learning, and rubric is missing some detail (assesses learning targets, is complex, weighted, and how it will be scored.)
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
70 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #6C – Assessment
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to document learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s ongoing planning and instruction.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
0 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormative Assessment
|
|
70 pts
Advanced
*Formative assessments: fully based on learning targets, all assessments are teacher created, are valid, are student friendly, and contain a scoring criterion that includes an explanation of how results will be used to guide future instruction for all students.
|
59.5 pts
Proficient
*Formative assessment: closely based on learning targets, all assessments are teacher-created, are valid, are student-friendly, and contain a scoring criterion that includes an explanation of how results will be used to guide future instruction for all students.
|
49 pts
Basic
*Formative assessment: loosely based on learning targets, all assessments are teacher-created, are valid, are student-friendly, and contain a scoring criterion that includes an explanation of how results will be used to guide future instruction for all students.
|
38.5 pts
Minimal
*Formative assessment: not based on learning targets. OR Fully formatted teacher and student copies are not provided. OR Assessments are not original OR No plan for use of results to guide future instruction
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
70 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #6D – Assessment
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to document learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s ongoing planning and instruction.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA-compliant formatting
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted title page, citations, quotations, and references (1-2 MINOR errors)
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted title page, citations, quotations, and references (3-4 MINOR errors).
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Limited (5-6) APA errors in APA format including title page, citations, quotations, or references.
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
More than 6 APA errors in format including title page, citations, quotations, or references.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
10.5 pts
Basic
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
15 pts
|
|
Total Points: 400
|
