0 Comments

1.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVV-K56I7ro&list=PLoHCsZBLJKM_TWidHjSKnoQ31wmXUc8PT

 

The discussion for this week is on the video clip on New York during Reconstruction.  The prompt for this weeks discussion is:

  • How did New York benefit from the civil War and why?

As with many questions there is not just one right answer, so don't feel you have to look for one.

Requirements for this assignment:

  • Your post should be about 1 paragraph long and is due on Friday by midnight. (14 points)

2.  How has globalization contributed to a resurgence in political populism and economic nationalism? 

3.  

Map 22.3 Hunger is a global problem: Undernourishment by country — evaluation

According to this map, in which regions is undernourishment very high?

Comparing this map with Map 22.4, identify at least twelve countries where undernourishment is very high and per capita income is low. What other characteristics do these regions share?

CHAPTER 22

Twenty-First-Century Global Challenges

2001–the Present

Copyright © 2021, W. W. Norton & Company

1

The global “war on terror” achieves successes and failures in its fight against fundamentalist terrorists.

The benefits of a globally integrated economy are unequally distributed, creating substantial tensions within and across societies.

Mounting geopolitical and economic uncertainties lead to a rise in populist politics and economic nationalism, polarizing many countries politically. Heightened political polarization helped bring expanding state violence, racial justice demonstrations, and LGBTQ rights into focus.

Twenty-first-century globalization contributes to an increasing incidence and prevalence of pandemics.

Economic development and human consumption cause climate change, with substantial negative effects on biodiversity, water quality, and food production.

Global Storyline

What is modern globalization? How is it different from earlier forms of global integration?

What are some of the global challenges we face in the twenty-first century?

In what ways has climate change affected the world, and what can be done to lessen or reverse the impact of climate change?

Who are the beneficiaries of modern globalization? Who has not benefited? Why is this?

How has globalization contributed to a resurgence in political populism and economic nationalism?

Focus Questions

September 11, 2001

Al-Qaeda militants crashed hijacked airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

United States responded with invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan

Economic turmoil

Crisis of 2008

Rise of right-wing populists

Pandemics

SARS, Ebola, COVID-19

Global Challenges

The end of the Cold War brought the ideological conflicts of the twentieth century to a close. But new conflicts quickly emerged in the twenty-first century.  

The September 11, 2001 attacks highlighted the tensions emerging at the turn of the millennium. Militants from a little-known Islamic fundamentalist organization called al-Qaeda hijacked commercial airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing more than 3,000 people. The United States mounted an aggressive military response by invading Afghanistan, which had provided a safe-haven for al-Qaeda and its leader, Osama bin Laden. Then, the United States invaded Iraq, which it incorrectly blamed for engineering the attacks. 

In addition to new wars, the first decade of the twenty-first century saw economic turmoil. An economic crisis in 2008 highlighted sharpening global inequalities, as some groups suffered disproportionately while others were spared. Anger and resentment born from the economic crisis contributed to the rise of right-wing populist parties. Donald Trump, elected U.S. president in 2016, was one of many world leaders who criticized “globalists” for betraying national economies and encouraging immigration. 

On top of this, the closely integrated world was more vulnerable than ever. Outbreaks of SARS and Ebola heralded the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020, the worst pandemic since the 1918 flu. 

As these forces fractured the international community, challenges requiring global cooperation only intensified.

4

World responded to 9/11 with revulsion

Militants claimed that it was a response to U.S. imperialist policies in the Middle East

President George W. Bush 

Pushed for domestic security measures

Declared “global war on terror” 

Invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq

Successful offensive, but rebuilding proved difficult

Osama bin Laden killed in 2011

American image suffered internationally

Barack Obama elected in 2008

War on Terror

Initially, the world responded to the 9/11 attacks with revulsion. Al-Qaeda claimed that the attacks were retaliation for U.S. imperialist policies in the Middle East. 

President George W. Bush gained broad public support by pushing for domestic security measures and for a tough military response to the attacks. Declaring a “global war on terror,” Bush ordered the invasion of Afghanistan to capture bin Laden and destroy al-Qaeda. Soon after, Bush falsely accused Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi authoritarian leader, of helping organize the attacks and possessing weapons of mass destruction. In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq as well. Both offensives initially went well, but restoring order and rebuilding two countries thrown into political chaos proved difficult. 

As time passed, neither weapons of mass destruction nor clear links between Hussein and al-Qaeda were discovered. Many U.S. citizens began to question the wisdom of the war as troop losses mounted in the face of a protracted insurgency. The situation in Afghanistan also gradually worsened. Local warlords took power from the weak U.S.-backed government in Kabul. Meanwhile, the Taliban recovered in neighboring Pakistan.  Although Osama bin Laden was finally killed in 2011, the American image had suffered internationally. 

The Bush administration relied on coercive interrogation techniques, torture, inhumane treatment of prisoners, and indefinite detention. Over time, this cost the administration both domestic and international support.

 

This erosion of support helped Barack Obama win the presidency in 2008. Over the next few years, Obama ended the occupation of Iraq, shifting focus to Afghanistan. 

5

2007–2008 economic crisis

Growing risk and indebtedness ignored

Lehman Brothers allowed to collapse

Great Recession

U.S. unemployment reached 10 percent

Government intervention mitigated damage

European Union reluctant to bail out troubled countries

Greece, Italy, and Hungary see rising unemployment

U.S. and China spending and lending propped up global economy

Crisis and Inequality in the Global Economy (1 of 2)

As the new military conflicts deepened, the world was beset by the worst economic crisis since the 1930s. The crisis began in the financial sector.  Investors made increasingly risky investments, especially in the housing market. In the United States, risk and indebtedness climbed, but the government did nothing. Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time, was a proponent of free markets. This led him to believe that the market would sort out the problems by itself. 

But this did not happen. Instead, banks became increasingly indebted. In 2008, two leading investment firms—Bear Sterns and Lehman Brothers—collapsed.  Although the government bailed out Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers was left to crumble. This sent shockwaves throughout the global financial system, launching a global economic recession called the Great Recession. 

The economic downturn was severe. Unemployment in the United States reached 10 percent. But it was not as severe as the Great Depression.  This was partly due to aggressive government measures to mitigate the damage. The U.S. government protected big banks, provided easy credit, and encouraged international trade and cooperation. The bailouts of big banks appear to have rescued the economy from further damage. But this came at a political cost. Many Americans resented the assistance offered to the banks who had caused the crisis.  

The European Union was less enthusiastic about bailouts. This meant that the European economy recovered slowly. Heavily indebted countries like Greece, Italy, and Hungary saw employment rates soar. 

In China, the government encouraged state firms to continue spending and borrowing. With the United States doing the same, both of these large economies helped prop up the global economy. 

6

Free market ideology

Rise of economists to positions of political power

Debates over government intervention

Growing prosperity and global middle class emerges, but there is anger over deepening inequality

Occupy Wall Street

Crisis and Inequality in the Global Economy (2 of 2)

The roots of the crisis lay in the rise of economists who believed in free market ideology to positions of political power. Debates over the extent of government intervention in the economy had carried on for decades. During the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt had relied on the ideas of John Maynard Keynes, who believed that governments needed to use all tools available to prevent economic crises.  

But after World War II, the belief that markets will naturally sort out problems gained credence. At the same time, economists saw their image improve. For much of the twentieth century, economists were not highly respected by policymakers. But in the postwar period, they began to have a stronger voice in national economic affairs. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan’s administration pursued free market policies under the direction of Alan Greenspan. 

Free market policies stimulated global trade and raised standards of living around the world. But they also led to deepening inequalities. While some countries, like China and India, saw an expanding middle class, in the United States the middle class shrunk. As U.S. manufacturing jobs were increasingly exported overseas, wealth became concentrated in an ever-smaller number of hands. The rising corporate elite used their wealth to influence politics, especially after the Supreme Court allowed corporations to make unlimited political contributions. 

As inequality rose, popular resentment intensified. In 2011, this resentment coalesced into a protest movement called Occupy Wall Street, which quickly spread around the world. 

7

Climate change one of the most pressing issues for the new millennium

Leaders acknowledge that humans are contributing to/causing global warming

Emissions of greenhouse gases

2015: United Nations Framework on Climate Change

Agreement to limit emission of greenhouse gases

United States withdrew, other countries ignored provisions

Climate Change

In addition to economic crisis, the twenty-first century saw the emergence of climate change as a pressing issue. Although scientists had been warning of increasing global temperatures for decades, by the early twenty-first century the evidence was undeniable. A broad, international scientific consensus developed that humans were directly responsible for major reductions in biodiversity. Agriculture, deforestation, and increasing reliance on fossil fuels all contributed the climate crisis. 

Although climate change demands international cooperation, this has proved challenging. Countries disagreed over who should shoulder the burden. However, in 2015, the international community appeared to reach a breakthrough with Paris Agreement, which set a goal of achieving a less than 1.5 percent increase in global temperature. The agreement was broadly signed and ratified.  

However, Donald Trump, elected to the American presidency in 2016, withdrew the United States from the agreement. Other countries remained signatories but ignored the agreement’s provisions. At the same time, smaller countries made important strides in shifting to sustainable energy sources. 

8

COVID-19 outbreak

Began in Wuhan, China

Spread around the world within months

Brought global economy to a halt

Migrant workers especially hard-hit

Pandemics

Adding to years of chaos in the second decade of the twenty-first century, a major pandemic struck the world in late 2019. COVID-19 originated in Wuhan, China.  Although the causes remain unclear, China’s expanding food production system had long carried the risk of forming new viruses.  By March 2020, the WHO declared the new disease had become a pandemic.  

Although COVID-19 was one of many disastrous pandemics in world history, it brought the global economy to halt in an unprecedented way. This reflects how closely intertwined the world had become. The effects of the virus varied widely. Some countries managed to respond quickly and effectively. Others, like the United States, Great Britain, and Brazil, lagged in their response and suffered immense consequences. 

The economic effects were far reaching. U.S. unemployment hit 15 percent, economies shrank, oil exporters reeled. Migrant workers around the world were especially hard-hit. Many were trapped by lockdowns or expelled by host countries, forced to return home with no wages. 

In addition to widespread suffering, there were also displays of solidarity and international cooperation.

9

The United States

The Obama administration experienced a conservative backlash

Occupy Wall Street movement highlighted the nation’s growing inequality

2016 election: Donald Trump becomes president; his victory reflected the rising populist and nationalist tide against globalization

A changing western Europe

Divisions emerge over the fate of NATO and the European Union

Britain votes to leave the European Union

Euro causes damage, especially in Greece

Refugee crisis

Rise of right-wing populism

The United States, the European Union, and Japan

In the United States, the Obama administration’s attempts at reform met staunch resistance from Republicans. In 2009, a conservative backlash was already forming. A movement called the Tea Party, which championed small government and free market ideology galvanized the Republican base. The Democratic Party lost control of the House of Representatives in 2010. 

Meanwhile, the Occupy Wall Street movement motivated activism on the political left. This restored the favor of Obama and the Democratic Party, but not for long.

In 2016, Donald Trump was elected president in a stunning upset victory. Trump won popularity by repudiating globalization. He pointed to immigration, crime, international trade, and international alliances as the sources of America’s problems. In office, his administration attempted to unravel the fabric of the post-1945 world order. 

In Europe, economic crises led to tensions within the European Union. Divisions over economic policy and immigration came to the fore after the 2008 economic slump. In 2016, Britain voted by referendum to leave the European Union, sparking further chaos and uncertainty.  Meanwhile, EU monetary policies hurt southern European economies like Greece, which grappled with high unemployment and falling standards of living. 

Immigration was also a major source of division. This intensified as waves of migrants from Africa and the Middle East flowed into Europe. Fleeing war and political instability, refugees made dangerous journeys over mountains and across the Mediterranean. Thousands died. European countries responded differently to this humanitarian crisis. Germany admitted 1 million refugees, while other countries sought to exclude newcomers.  

All of these factors combined to encourage the rise of right-wing, populist leaders with strong anti-immigration, anti-EU messages.

10

Two threats to Europe’s integration, future peace, and prosperity are the interlocking issues of aging and immigration

European women having fewer children and population is aging

To achieve a balance between workers and pensioners, Europe needs to attract around 15 million immigrants annually

Sustainable economic growth has proven elusive

Immigrants often live in impoverished conditions and face xenophobia, especially against Muslims

Islam is the fastest-growing religion in Europe

Demographic Issues in Western Countries (1 of 2)

Aging populations and immigration present Europe, the United States, and Japan with serious challenges. Falling birthrates in Europe mean fewer workers to support expanding pension programs. Europe needs to attract 15 million workers annually to maintain balance, but so far has failed to do so. Despite the clear economic need for immigrants, many Europeans see immigration as a threat. Millions of Muslim immigrants have settled in Europe, but often live in poverty. Those with guest-worker status are also excluded from the full benefits of citizenship. Europeans who equate Europe with Christendom see the rapid growth of Islam as a cultural threat. 

11

United States also faces imbalance of workers: retirees

Concern over Social Security system’s sustainability

New immigrants shift ethnic composition of nation

Donald Trump made control of immigration central to his campaign for presidency

Japan: deepening labor shortages led to increased dependence on immigrant workers

Demographic Issues in Western Countries (2 of 2)

The United States faces similar problems. Falling birthrates and increased life expectancy have strained its Social Security system. Immigrants from Asia and Latin America offer a potential economic solution. However, like in Europe, there is stiff resistance to immigration. Anti-immigrant sentiment helped propel Donald Trump to power. 

Japan also confronts a similar dilemma. Japan has been especially resistant to welcoming foreign workers. In the 1960s, the government preferred to balance the labor shortage with automation and with workers of Japanese descent from abroad. However, beginning in the 1980s, Japan began admitting larger numbers of foreign workers from Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. 

12

Europe: high unemployment has caused sharp backlash

Far-right groups rally against immigration

In recent years, anti-immigrant sentiments and especially anti-Muslim feelings have grown

Murder of Dutch filmmaker and a French newspaper's anti-Islamic cartoons started discussions on nations' tolerance of diversity as well as the assimilation (and assimilability) of Muslims

Frequent terrorist attacks

United States

Trump administration imposes restrictions on immigration from Muslim countries and seeks to end DACA policy

Anti-Immigrant Sentiments in Western Countries

Anti-immigrant sentiment has reshaped the political landscapes of many western countries. In Europe, high unemployment has led to a backlash against immigrants. This has fueled the rise of far-right parties, which have gained seats in numerous European parliaments. 

Immigration has become intertwined with the issue of terrorism and the assimilability of Muslims in Europe. The murder of a Dutch filmmaker, terrorist attacks in Spain and London, and the murder of staff members at a French newspaper have sharpened the debate. In France, 2005 riots in poor neighborhoods led to deportations and proposals to strip people of citizenship. 

In the United States, the Trump administration also pursued an anti-immigration agenda. The administration separated children from their families at the U.S. border, sought to end the DACA policy, and banned immigration from several majority-Muslim countries. 

13

Map 22.1 | Population Growth, 2017

Map 22.1 | Population Growth, 2016

The demographic patterns observed early in the twenty-first century pose major problems for the industrialized societies of western Europe, North America, and Japan. As life expectancy increases and population growth slows, these regions’ economies face labor shortages that have fueled immigration.

• According to this map and Map 22.2, which regions of the world are prime candidates for sending migrants to the industrialized world?

• What cultural and political dilemmas does this phenomenon create?

• Which states within the industrialized world do you think have created the best environment for immigrant residents?

14

Map 22.2 | Life Expectancies in Global Perspective, 2018

Map 22.2 | Life Expectancies in Global Perspective, 2018

Increased attention to public health, medicine, nutrition, and education since the early nineteenth century has contributed to prolonging life expectancy around the world, as have the many scientific breakthroughs and technological advancements of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

• According to Map 22.1 and this map, which regions experienced population increases but low life expectancies? Population decreases and high life expectancies? Explain.

• Which countries do not match the life expectancy trends of their geographical regions? Why?

• Do you note any correlations between a region’s life expectancy and its physical environment? Why or why not?

15

In Europe, Japan, and North America, “outsourcing,” or relocating manufacturing to places where cheap labor is already available, fuels anti-immigration sentiment 

Economic globalization and political effects

Technological advances, particularly in computers and communication, allow businesses to be based anywhere in the world

Workers do not have to leave India and China for employment in industrialized countries, as corporations take their operations there

Russia, China, and India had healthy economic growth in the twenty-first century

Russia’s economy is prospering from oil revenues

Political system becoming more restrictive

Russia, China, and India

Outsourcing has fueled political tensions in Europe, Japan, and North America. As it became cheaper to relocate manufacturing jobs overseas, many traditional manufacturing centers faced rising unemployment. 

Technological advances have made it easier for business to operate in multiple locations all over the globe. China, India, and Russia are key destinations for corporations. As a result, these three economies have grown substantially. Recently, China has evolved from a trading partner to a trading competitor. 

Russia’s economy has prospered from oil revenues. However, its political system has become increasingly closed. President Vladimir Putin led the consolidation of the central Russian state after the chaos of the Yeltsin years. In the process, he repossessed two major television stations and key energy companies. The result was an authoritarian state dominated by the executive. Under Putin, Russia also engaged in expansionism. In 2014, it annexed Crimea. At the same time, the government has sought to tamp down LGBTQ activism. 

Although Donald Trump has expressed admiration for Putin, American policies toward Russia have remained hostile. 

16

Like Russia, China encouraged market economic reforms while quashing the possibilities for political liberalization

China’s economy is growing at an annual average of 9 percent

Chinese consumer goods dominate world markets

China’s economy second largest in the world and by midcentury is projected to be the largest

Growing and alarming gap between rich and poor: 1 percent of Chinese households controlled one-third of the country’s assets; poorest 25 percent owned 1 percent of wealth

Growing concerns about China’s environmental impact as 40 percent more coal is consumed than in the United States, and Chinese urban dwellers suffer from the worst smog and air quality

China: Market Reforms and Shifting Foreign Policy

China has also seen massive economic growth along with tightening political controls. For decades, China has seen spectacular GDP growth as its manufactured goods have flooded world markets. Currently it is the second largest economy in the world. Some projections suggest that it will become the largest by midcentury.

However, along with growth have come sharpening inequalities. Some estimate that 1 percent of Chinese households control one-third of the country’s wealth, while the poorest 25 percent own 1 percent of wealth. At the same time, China’s rapid development has raised concerns about environmental impacts. Increasing standards of living have raised energy usage, much of which still comes from coal. This has led to disastrous levels of air pollution in China’s cities. 

17

Disenchantment with globalization led to questioning of long-standing trade relationships

Withdrawal from TPP

Renegotiation of NAFTA

Tensions with China

Trade imbalance

Accusations of currency manipulation, industrial espionage

Trump administration initiates a trade war

Tit-for-tat tariff increases

Consumers likely to see rising costs

China’s Trade War with America

Disenchantment with globalization threatened long-standing trade relationships. As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump railed against trade agreements that he said disadvantaged American companies. Upon gaining office, he immediately withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In 2018, he renegotiated NAFTA, although much of the original agreement remained intact. 

Trump’s chief target was China. The United States had long maintained a growing trade imbalance with China. Trump increased tensions between the two countries by accusing China of manipulating its currency and engaging in industrial espionage. In 2018, Trump initiated a trade war by applying tariffs to $60 billion dollars of Chinese goods. This led to a spiraling tit for tat between the two countries. With disagreements yet to be resolved, consumers face rising costs.

18

1997: Britain cedes Hong Kong to People’s Republic of China

Agreement maintains that Hong Kong would retain capitalist system for fifty years

Chief executive to be elected by all citizens in 2017

China chipped away at the agreement

2017 protests of extradition law

2020 security law

Hong Kong Protests

China also faced challenges integrating Hong Kong. Although Britain had ceded Hong Kong to China in 1997, the agreement maintained that Hong Kong would retain a capitalist system for fifty years. At the same time, the agreement laid a blueprint for the transition to democratic institutions.  By 2017, Hong Kong’s chief executive was supposed to be elected by popular vote.  

However, China whittled away at the agreement. In 2017, Hong Kong’s Beijing-backed chief executive attempted to pass a law allowing Hong Kong to extradite prisoners for trial on the mainland. This would have effectively nullified Hong Kong’s judicial independence. Although massive protests forced the withdrawal of the law, China managed to pass a new security law in 2020. This curbed the city’s autonomy and slashed civil liberties. 

19

Since 1990s, Indian economy increasingly open

Information technology sector boomed

Social progress

Inequality and poverty remain problems

Open season on land acquisition displaced farmers and forest dwellers

Corruption in Congress Party

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) comes to power in 2014

India: Economic Liberalization and Its Effects

In India, economic reforms beginning in the 1990s increased the country’s openness to the global economy. India saw rapid growth, especially in the information technology sector. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of this growth. Migrant workers and middle-class families saw their gains evaporate. 

In addition to economic growth, India pursued some social reforms. In 2018, India’s Supreme Court decriminalized homosexuality.  

Despite these gains, poverty and inequality remained problems. To boost growth, the government declared open season on land acquisition. This displaced farmers and forest dwellers, who responded violently. Amid this discontent, the Congress Party saw its political support weaken. In 2014, the BJP under Narendra Modi secured power. 

20

Internal divisions and external rivalries threaten the economic gains won by China, Russia, and India

India

Hindu nationalism

2002: Gujarat riots

2019: Modi tightens grip on Kashmir

Tensions with Pakistan

China and India expected to move to the economic fore in the twenty-first century

Internal Divisions, External Rivalries

Internal divisions and external rivalries threaten the economic gains won by China, Russia, and India. In India, the government has balanced economic rivalries with strident Hindu nationalism. This has alienated the country’s minorities, especially Muslims. Long-simmering tensions erupted in 2002, when Hindu mobs in the state of Gujarat killed more than 2,000 Muslims. The BJP-dominated Gujarati government was accused of abetting the violence.  

In 2019, the BJP government stripped the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir of its autonomy. This inflamed tensions with Pakistan and India’s Muslim neighbors. India’s relationship with Pakistan had long been tense, with both countries testing nuclear weapons in the late 1990s.  

Many observers expect China and India to move to the economic fore in the twenty-first century. But these countries are also beset by troubling challenges, both internally and abroad. 

21

Map 22.3 | Hunger Is a Global Problem: Undernourishment by Country, 2014–2016

Map 22.3 | Hunger Is a Global Problem: Undernourishment by Country, 2014–2016

Despite much optimism on the part of world leaders, globalization has not yet met the basic human needs of the entire world population. In 2019, the proportion of undernourished people in the world declined to 8.9 percent. But a United Nations report predicted that the COVID-19 pandemic could push 130 million more people into chronic hunger by 2020’s end.

• According to this map, in which regions is undernourishment very high?

• Comparing this map with Map 22.4, identify at least twelve countries where undernourishment is very high and per capita income is low. What other characteristics do these regions share?

22

The Middle East: Radical change or continuity?

The Arab Spring

Triggered in Tunisia: 26-year-old vegetable vendor set himself on fire to protest police harassment, December 17, 2010

Aroused entire population against the ruling elite

Demanded end to long-term dictatorship of Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali since 1978

Ben Ali left for Saudi Arabia on January 14, 2011

In Egypt, January 25, 2011, protest movement against Hosni Mubarak centered on Tahrir (Liberation) Square

February 11, 2011, Mubarak left his office to the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces

Tunisia’s and Egypt's ousters inspired protests throughout the Arab world

Consistent demands:

End to repression

Creating democratic institutions

Ousting rulers in power too long who had not represented the people

The Middle East, Africa, and Latin America

In the Middle East, the Arab Spring and the growth of Islamic militancy have produced radical change. In Africa, several countries have begun to achieve economic progress and political stability. 

The Arab Spring began in December 2011, when a young Tunisian man set himself on fire to protest police harassment. This act triggered a release of long pent-up resentment against the dictatorship of Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. Protesters railed against authoritarian rule and corruption, and succeeded in ousting Ben Ali a month later. 

The Tunisian protest movement inspired a similar movement in Egypt. There, a massive movement emerged in opposition to the regime of Hosni Mubarak. Mubarak lost the support of the military and left office within weeks. A military interim government emerged to oversee the establishment of a new government.  

The success of these movements inspired protests throughout the Arab world. They articulated a consistent set of demands: an end to repression, the creation of democratic institutions, and the ouster of long-term rulers. Many of these movements achieved remarkable political successes, especially in Bahrain, Yemen, and Libya.  

23

Early results were promising

Dictators ousted

Free elections held

New constitutions promised

Progress hard to sustain

Muslim Brotherhood parties win elections in Egypt

Egyptian president Morsi ousted by military leader, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi

Sisi elected president in 2014

Syria most lethal outcome

Civil war between Free Syrian Army and President Bashar al-Assad

500,000 lives lost so far

Major refugee crisis

Arab Spring: early successes ended in failure

The Arab Spring Becomes an Arab Winter

The early results of the Arab Spring were promising. The ousting of dictators, holding of free elections, and the promise of new constitutions produced widespread optimism.  

But this progress proved hard to sustain. The Muslim Brotherhood won elections in Egypt. The new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, resigned from the Brotherhood to send the message that he intended to represent all Egyptians. However, he attempted to acquire powers outside the reach of the judiciary. This led Egypt’s military leader, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, to oust Morsi and persecute the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2014, he was elected president by a wide margin, and has secured the right to remain in power until 2030. 

The most lethal outcome of the Arab Spring occurred in Syria. There, protesters against the Assad regime formed the Free Syrian Army. The ensuing war has cost 500,000 lives and produced a major refugee crisis. 

Although the Arab Spring began in optimism and achieved early successes, almost everywhere it ended in failure. Many ruling elites managed to hold on to political power, backed by militaries. Leaders of the protest movements were not able to form stable political parties. Sectarianism also played a role in preventing political coalitions. 

24

Map 22.4 | Rich and Poor Countries: Per Capita Annual Income (U.S. $), 2018

Map 22.4 | Rich and Poor Countries: Per Capita Annual Income (U.S. $), 2018

Wealth and income derived from globalization have not been shared equally among the regions of the world, a problem which has been exacerbated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

• Using this map, identify the regions with the highest per capita income and those with the lowest. What factors do you think account for this disparity? What historical antecedents helped create this disparity?

• According to your reading, why have India and China, despite recent economic growth, failed to catch up with the United States, western European countries, and Japan in terms of per capita income?

25

Americans reduced the power of al-Qaeda, but ISIS rose to take its place, becoming an even more formidable opponent.

Islamic militancy has deep historical roots

Founder of ISIS, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, willing to employ extreme violence

Successor to al-Zarqawi, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, had a territorial state

After conquering Mosul, ISIS controlled territory equivalent to the UK, with population of 6-9 million and army of 30,000

2017: American military claimed that 98 percent of ISIS’s territory had been recaptured

Militant Islam here to stay

Islamic Militancy

In the early 2000s, the US managed to curtail the power of al-Qaeda by killing several of its most prominent leaders. However, an even more formidable militant group rose in its place.

Islamic militancy has deep historical roots. In the 20th century, some Muslim intellectuals applied the notion of jihad to the challenges Muslim countries faced in a world dominated by Western countries. Some proposed that the Muslims could unite to challenge the West and usher in a new age of Muslim dominance. Organizations like al-Qaeda took inspiration from such ideas, and sought to use terrorist attacks to challenge American power in the late 20th century. However, once the governments that sponsored al-Qaeda crumbled, al-Qaeda lost much of its influence.

ISIS filled the vacuum left by al-Qaeda. The founder of ISIS, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was willing to employ even more extreme forms of violence. His organization was originally an affiliate of al-Qaeda that took root in Iraq, where state-building efforts continued to falter after the American invasion. After he was killed in 2006, his organization splintered. Al-Zarqawi’s successor, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi formed ISIS, which managed to form a territorial state based in northern and central Iraq. This state strengthened when American forces departed the country.

ISIS conquered Mosul in 2014, greatly expanding its territory. At its height it included a population of 6-9 million and an army of 30,000. Al-Baghdadi declared that he was Islam’s new Caliph, the spiritual and political leader of Muslims worldwide. However, beginning in 2017 ISIS was gradually beaten back until al-Baghdadi committed suicide in 2019.

Despite the demise of ISIS as a territorial state, it continues to maintain a grip on the imaginations of many marginalized Muslims groups.

26

Mid-June 2015: Iran and U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France, Germany, and the EU negotiated agreement involving Iran’s nuclear program

Nuclear agreement would run for ten years, and would allow inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities while permitting Iranians to enrich uranium for civil, not military, uses

Financial and economic sanctions against Iran lifted

2018: Donald Trump pulled U.S. out of the agreement

2019: US-Iran pushed to the brink of war

The Iranian Nuclear Deal

In mid-June 2015, Iran and the US, Russia, China, and several European countries signed a major agreement on Iran’s nuclear program. For nearly a decade, disputes over this issue had isolated Iran and led to the imposition of severe economic sanctions. The agreement stipulated that sanctions would be lifted in exchange for certain concessions. Iran was to allow inspections of its facilities and would only enrich uranium for civil, not military, purposes.

At first, the deal appeared to work. With sanctions lifted Iran’s economy began to prosper. However, Donald Trump pulled out of the deal in 2018. Although European governments attempted to shore up the agreement, Iran began to violate some of its stipulations. US-Iranian relations hit a new low. The countries were pushed to brink of war in 2019, when Iran shot down an American drone. President Trump called off a retaliatory attack at the last minute.

27

Hard-line government took hold

Unstable coalition under Benjamin Netanyahu

Despite corruption scandals, Netanyahu has managed to cling to power

The Future of Israel

As in other places in the world, a hard-line government has taken hold in Israel that has emphasized national sovereignty over global norms. Although this government is built on an unstable political coalition and its leader Benjamin Netanyahu has been plagued by corruption scandals, it has managed to hold on to power.

28

Map 22.5 Warring Factions in Iraq and Syria, March 27, 2017

Map 22.5 | Warring Factions in Iraq and Syria, March 27, 2017

This map shows the territories held by Kurdish fighters, ISIS, rebel Syrian fighters, and the Iraqi and Syrian governments.

Compare the territories held by ISIS with the map of the boundaries set by the Sykes-Picot agreement (see Map 19.4). How similar are the territories that ISIS held in March 2017 to those that Sykes-Picot reserved for an Arab confederation?

ISIS contends that the British-French agreements for the division of the Arab world after World War I need to be abolished. Why does ISIS hold these views?

Why would the Turkish, Iraqi, and Syrian governments be dismayed that the Kurds have become the strongest militia fighting against ISIS?

29

Poorest region in the world

Uncontrolled and uncontrollable spread of HIV/AIDS

Some promising signs

Ghana embraced parliamentary and presidential elections

Civil strife in Mozambique and Angola ended

South Africa convened Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Economic growth in Rwanda, Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa

Elsewhere, political instability persists

Nigeria: regional divisions threaten fragile democratic institutions

Sudan and Darfur: ethnic cleansing against settled agriculturalists

Hope is exemplified by Liberia ending its civil war and holding an election in 2005, with Africa's first woman president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, elected

Africa: Poverty, Disease, Genocide, and Progress

Although globalization has lifted numerous people out of poverty, it has also sharpened inequalities. Africa has remained one of the poorest regions of the globe. Poverty has combined with civil strife and uncontrollable AIDS epidemic around the turn of the millennium.

Nevertheless, there are some promising signs. Ghana has embraced democratic institutions, and civil strife has ended in Mozambique and Angola. South Africa has convened a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to address the legacy of apartheid and severe economic inequalities. Rwanda, Nigeria, and Kenya have all experienced economic growth and a rising middle class.

Elsewhere, political instability persists. In Nigeria, democratic institutions remain fragile. Regional divisions over wealth distribution remain, while in the northeast a militant Muslim group called Boko Haram grows in strength. Although the civil war in Sudan ended in 2011, civil strife and ethnic cleansing has continued in Darfur.

However, the end of Liberia’s civil war offers some hope. In 2005, the country elected Africa’s first woman president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf.

30

Map 22.6 | Numbers of HIV-Positive People Worldwide, 2016

Map 22.6 | Numbers of HIV-Positive People Worldwide, 2016

The spread of HIV/AIDS threatens the development of human capital in the twenty-first century.

• According to this map, which region has the highest rate of HIV infection?

• Using Maps 22.3 and 22.4 for reference, what connections do you see between poverty and HIV/AIDS prevalence?

• How does the spread of HIV/AIDS compromise economic development in poorer regions of the world?

31

Globalization has deepened economic inequality in some of the poorest parts of the world

Latin America historically the world’s most unequal region

Rich live like rich in wealthy countries

Poor continue to struggle

Trend in voting for left-wing governments

Offer policies to soften blows of globalization and meet basic needs

Globalization limits how efficacious these governments can be

Recent shift to the right

In many nations, programs designed to check globalization have found receptive audiences

Latin America: Deepening Inequalities

As in Africa, globalization has deepened inequalities. Latin America has historically been the world’s most unequal regions. Latin American elites maintain a material standard of living on par with those of Europe or the US. But the poor remain poor. In many cases, global competition have made the lives of Latin America’s poor even more difficult.

One response to these challenges has been the election of leftist governments. Such governments have typically pursued policies aimed at softening the blow of globalization and helping people meet basic needs. Some governments have equated globalization with imperialism and American dominance.

Recently, however, Latin America has seen a rightward shift. Similar to other countries around the world, Latin American voters have opted for nationalist, populist leaders like Jair Bolsonaro.

In many nations, policies designed to check globalization have found broad support.

32

Resurgence of populist political sentiments

”The people” against their enemies

U.S.: rise of ethnic nationalists, election of strong right-wing politicians

Britain: vote to leave the European Union

India: Prime Minister Narendra Modi used social media to portray himself as a leader working to advance India’s interests against foreign and domestic enemies

Reaction against populism?

Populist leaders see their popularity wane

A Global Trend Toward Populist Politics and Authoritarian Regimes

In the second decade of the21st century, there was an upsurge in populist politics. Stemming in part from the frustrations of the 2008 financial crisis, populist leaders claimed to speak for ”the people” against a wide variety of enemies. Populism took various forms. In some places, it was highly autocratic. In democracies like the US and Britain, it took shape as a surge in ethnic nationalism and the election of strong right-wing parties. In Britain, populism fueled the vote to leave the European Union.

In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi fashioned himself as a populist leader while targeting minorities like Dalits and Muslims. He has been successful at identifying his policies with the national interest while branding his critics as “anti-national.”

However, there are some signs of a reaction against populism. Donald Trump faced difficult challenges in his campaign for re-election. Recep Erdogan’s chosen candidate for the mayor of Istanbul was decisively defeated. Boris Johnson has faced sinking popularity in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

33

Shocks to globalization shed light on states’ harsh treatment of their own citizens

Police violence

Black Lives Matter

2013 protests of acquittal in Trayvon Martin case

2020 killing of George Floyd sparked global protests

Mobilization for LGBTQ rights

Several milestones in 2010s

2019-20 events have revealed disproportionate impacts of globalization

State Violence and the Struggles for Racial Justice and LGBTQ Rights

Challenges to globalization have shed light on states’ harsh treatment of their own citizens. This is especially apparent with the issue of police violence. In many countries, policing has become synonymous with the defense of privileged sectors of society.

In 2013, a global movement against police violence took shape. It began with protests surrounding the acquittal of George Zimmerman, who killed Trayvon Martin, a Black teenager, while he was on his way to his father’s house. This event shined a spotlight on police violence throughout the US. The Black Lives Matter movement emerged from these protests.

Black Lives Matter gained new momentum in 2020, when a massive protest movement took shape after the murder of George Floyd in police custody. The movement quickly spread around the globe. Social media played a crucial role. Videos of police suppression of protesters helped spur the movement on.

Alongside anti-racist activism, mobilization for LGBTQ rights intensified. The 2010s saw several important milestones for

the LGBTQ community, from representation in media to politics. Same-sex marriage is now recognized in twenty-nine countries.

The tumultuous events of 2019-20 have revealed the disproportionate impacts of globalization. While significant progress has been made, the world still faces serious challenges in the form of systemic racism, inequality, and the threat of climate change.

34

Freer markets and international trade created global middle class

Major banks and corporations bailed out of financial crisis of 2008, but the poor suffered

Marginalized peoples turn to nationalism

Globalization has drawn the world together, but also pushed numerous people to the margins

Conclusion: Globalization and Its Discontents

Globalization improved the material standard of living of millions of people. In China, India, Southeast Asia, and Africa, a new middle class emerged. Culture is increasingly shared by people around the globe.

However, there have been significant downsides, especially since the financial crisis of 2008. While corporate elites were given bailouts, the middle class suffered. Many people sank deeper into poverty. In the US, working class white people were among the hardest hit.

These conditions have fueled a backlash against globalization on several fronts. From populism to Islamic militancy, marginalized groups have made their frustration clear. While globalization has drawn the world together, it has also clearly pushed numerous people to the margins.

35

https://digital.wwnorton.com/worldstogether6

This concludes the Lecture Slide Set for Chapter 22 WORLDS TOGETHER, WORLDS APART SIXTH EDITION

image1.png

image2.png

image3.jpeg

image4.jpeg

image5.jpeg

image6.jpeg

image7.jpeg

image8.jpeg

Order Solution Now

Categories: